A conservation group wants Minnesotans heading to the polls to consider an issue that may not have come up on the campaign trail: preserving and funding national parks.
The National Parks Action Fund Scorecard tallies the voting records of U.S. House members on park funding bills, endangered species, and oil and gas development in and around these sites. In Minnesota's delegation, all four Republicans got failing grades and three Democrats got A's.
Kristen Brengel, executive director of National Parks Action, said they are not trying to pick on members of Congress but hope the scrutiny will help to change some votes moving forward.
"This is just part of our values system," Brengel asserted. "Do we love these places? Do we want to take care of them? Do we want to make sure they have adequate park rangers in them? And this vote is just a direct way to tell whether or not your member of Congress cares about the future of our national parks."
Overall, Brengel pointed out, more House members received F's than A's in part because last year, the House voted to cut funding for national parks by 13%. Rep. Dean Phillips, D-Minn., did not receive a score, as he is not seeking reelection after his recent run for president.
John Anfinson, retired superintendent of the Mississippi National River and Recreation Unit for the National Park Service, said keeping the system in good shape should be a bipartisan issue because people of all political views value national parks. And with Congress controlling the purse strings, he stressed its actions are vital in leaving these sites "unimpaired" for future generations.
"That the resources are protected, you know, endangered species are still there," Anfinson observed. "The infrastructure is in shape so you can have an enjoyable experience and a safe experience."
Park experts said the pandemic sparked a newfound appreciation for access to the outdoors and Anfinson added it is good business to provide it. He emphasized priorities centered around budget cuts create staffing pressure for park leaders, and visitors will notice.
"I think what would deter people from coming back is going to a National Park unit and not being able to find a park ranger to talk to," Anfinson cautioned. "Not having someone telling them about the resources of this park and why they're so special, whether it's historic or cultural."
Disclosure: The National Parks Conservation Association contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy and Priorities, Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species and Wildlife, Environment, Public Lands/Wilderness, and Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Minnesotans have until next Tuesday to offer their thoughts on the state's next Climate Action Framework.
Those tasked with protecting a distinct type of wetland hope the public learns more about their fate before speaking up.
Only trailing Alaska, Minnesota has the largest amount of peatlands in the U.S. They are waterlogged areas covered with dead plant materials, such as decaying leaves. Almost like a big kitchen sink on the landscape, they absorb carbon emissions while acting as ecosystems for a number of species.
Meredith Cornett, peatland resilience project planner for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, said drainage ditches for unused farmland have turned into a problem because water from peatlands flows into them.
"We are currently doing a demonstration project to identify the best candidates for locking these ditches," Cornett explained. "Filling them in some cases and trying to restore the natural hydrology."
If successful, they can prevent more peatlands from drying out and releasing stored emissions back into the atmosphere. A recent estimate found nearly 850,000 acres of peatland in Minnesota are partially drained. Cornett noted federal grants have helped with restoration work but she encouraged public comments through the updated Climate Action Framework to create more urgency.
In northeastern Minnesota, the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa is making a strong push to protect and restore peatlands.
Nancy Schuldt, water projects coordinator for the Fond du Lac Environmental Program, said beyond the emissions effects, the wetlands have a deep connection to tribal communities.
"It's important habitat for moose, an incredibly culturally significant species, which is in a population decline up in this region," Schuldt noted.
Habitat for other plant and animal species prioritized by Indigenous populations also benefit from having a diverse group of wetlands in place. In recent decades, the Fond du Lac Band has enhanced water management to overcome the drainage effects traced back to colonization.
Schuldt alluded to the broader threats, such as droughts made worse by climate change, while also calling for a greater political will to limit land development near peatlands.
Support for this reporting was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.
get more stories like this via email
The U.S. Supreme Court has opted not to hear a lawsuit brought by the State of Utah, which alleged the federal government's ownership of large parts of the state is unconstitutional.
The decision marks a win for conservation advocates.
Olivia Juarez, public land program director for the nonprofit GreenLatinos, said Utahns now will not have their tax dollars used to fund what they call the state's "ill-founded lawsuit and disinformation campaign." Utah had made the effort to seize public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management.
Juarez acknowledged with a Republican-dominated Congress, similar efforts may return.
"We are better set up to fight against some of the biggest challenges that the Trump administration is going to pose to the American public," Juarez contended. "Two of them namely being the climate and biodiversity crisis and also a cultural crisis about belonging."
Juarez pointed out public lands represent the origins of American and pre-American history. The case marks the latest setback for states looking to gain control of public lands, some of which hold valuable oil and gas, timber and other resources. Utah state leaders have said they have not ruled out taking their suit to a lower court.
The nomination hearing for Donald Trump's pick for Interior Secretary, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, is scheduled for this Thursday. The new administration will inherit a number of challenges, including disputes over conservation leases on Bureau of Land Management lands.
Juarez argued the multiple-use doctrine for public lands should be upheld.
"That rule will be under attack by the incoming Congress and presidential administration," Juarez noted. "It'll be important to reaffirm to the next secretary that conservation is a use that is valuable, economically as well as culturally."
Juarez added last weekend, public lands and conservation advocates rallied in Salt Lake City to show their support for protecting public lands across the Beehive State like the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments.
"Our goal was to bring people together at a time that it feels good," Juarez stressed. "It's a really hopeful moment for the nation's will to treat public lands as a solution to climate disaster, rather than making them part of the problem."
Disclosure: GreenLatinos contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Environmental Justice, Public Lands/Wilderness, and Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The White House announced two new national monuments in California on Tuesday, one just east of Palm Springs and the other near Shasta Lake.
A signing ceremony will take place next week, as the unveiling event was postponed due to high winds.
Rep. Raul Ruiz, D-Calif., whose district includes parts of the new 624,000 acre Chuckwalla National Monument, said the lands will now be protected from mining, drilling and development.
"This is one of these unique examples where you have both the conservation and tribal leaders, as well as the renewable energy and utility companies all endorsing this enormous monument," Ruiz explained.
The area south of Joshua Tree National Park is crucial habitat for the Chuckwalla lizard, bighorn sheep and the endangered desert tortoise.
Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said although President-elect Trump rescinded protections for some monument lands during his first administration, he hopes the two new monuments will endure.
"If the President-elect talks to the parties who really span the spectrum of interests, he will learn how this was a really well-thought-out effort to conserve this land but also make it possible to generate energy," Schiff asserted. "It's a win-win."
Thomas Tortez, former chairman of the Torres Martinez Tribe, noted his ancestral lands will now gain protections.
"The next step is to strategically develop a co-stewardship plan, put all those resources together and then, start to protect the land," Tortez added.
The White House also intends to designate the new Sátíttla Highlands National Monument, which covers 224,000 acres near Shasta Lake in northern California and contains the headwaters for California's entire watershed.
Brandy McDaniels, a member of the Pit River Tribe, said they have been fighting development in the area for decades.
"As social, economically suppressed communities, having to fight against people with deep pockets and have all the money in the world to come in and destroy our lands," McDaniels observed. "That's what we've been fighting to protect for a very long time."
get more stories like this via email